"Gavin Wheeler" wrote in message
om...

But I truly believe, both
from talking to the two trustees present *and* from a number of
ex-employees 'in the know', that this is not the case.

- They are down to 6 trustees. I don't know how many they started
with, but this was mentioned by several people.

If only two trustees were present out of six, then, in view of the crucial
nature of the meeting, it is obvious that at least four haven't learnt a
thing. Who might be in a position to dismiss them, and when may one expect
that to happen?

Franz