Rob Halgren writes:
'splitter'. Christenson's argument in his Phalaenopsis monograph is
reasonably convincing, especially if you take it in the context of his

Giving a reason that an error has been made at some point is one
thing.

Explaining why this error needs to be fixed is something very
different.

Trying to reuse a name already in use in the fix should be grounds for
immediate suspension by the heels on the local pier, with the head at
the low tide mark. When he survives a week of tides (my local tides,
mind. They are about 15cm) is when I will think reusing old names is a
good thing.

Geir - system designer