It may be 'in comparison of AHSupply and All-Glass' that Bruce claims the
difference... I have an AH Supply reflector, and it's more like a mirror...
I've never seen the AG reflector, but I do know many light kits come with
basic, generic white painted panels for reflectors.... white is good, but
it's no mirror...
--
RedForeman ©®
"Evergreen" no
wrote in message
...
I have the All Glass 2x55 compact flourescent hood on my 46 gallon
bowfront
and I think it does pretty well. Doubtless that many people in this group
are wiser than me with lights, but I am curious, Bruce, what is wrong with
the reflector? I look inside the hood and it looks pretty reflective to
me.
And it surrounds the bulbs at all angles. ??
"Homie" wrote in message
om...
Bruce
Unless my eyes deceive me the AG hood is the same in the compact and
regular fluorescent models. So you are implying neither is a "real
reflector"; by this I gather you are making the argument about shape
and reflector material? I am not sure I want to buy a $100 light just
to retrofit it later for another $100 or more.
Anyone else have any experience with either light assemblies or other
thoughts ?
Thanks
"Bruce Abrams" wrote in message
v.net...
I'd stay away from the AG compact hoods, as they don't have a real
reflector
and consequently lose a great deal of light. If you get the triple
fluorescent strip, find it doesn't provide enough light and are at all
handy, you can retrofit it with an excellent compact fluorescent kit
from
Aquarium Hobbyist Supply at http://ahsupply.com/index.html. I
installed
their 55 watt kit on my 36 bow-front and am growing even high light
requirement plants very lushly. I can only imagine how much light
their
96
watt at $60 plus bulb (or 2x96 watt! depending on your tank size)
would
provide.
wrote in message
...
I am thinking of upgrading my lighting system and see two choices.
1. All-Glass triple tube fluorescent strip at 40watts per bulb for a
total of 120watts.
2. All-Glass High Output Compact fluorescent double 2x55watt for a
total of 110watts
The cost of the assembly for (1) is cheaper at about $100, relative
to
around $130 for (2). The bulbs for (1) are around $9.00 and must be
replaced every 6 months to a year.
One, I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts about preferences
for
one or the other ? In terms of output, costs ?
Does anyone have info on the cost of the bulbs for (2) and how often
they need to be replaced ?
Much thanks