On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:49:43 -0500, Peter H wrote:


Alan Connor wrote:

So your point is exactly what?



I might suggest that this particular thread seems to have no real point
except to point out "de gustibus non disputandem est."

Pete H

--
We are all of one nation, all of one creed
We are all out of nature, all of one seed
I. Bairnson



The thread is entitled: Self-Sufficiency Acreage Requirement?

The amount of land a consumer of animal products needs is RADICALLY more

than an herbivorous person needs.


A great deal more work is required, and much more water.

Far more building materials.


More tools.


I'd call that pretty damned relevant.


We ARE talking about surviving in a world without money and stores and
vehicles, after all.

ANYTHING you can do to cut down on the workload is not only smart, but may
very well mean the difference between surviving and not-surviving.

May I suggest that before responding to any posts here, that you take a
look at the name of the newsgroup and the title of the thread?

Just a wee thought.....



AC