did anybody see this on urg?
"Franz Heymann" wrote in message
...
I think it is a pile of codswallop. Just say to yourself:
uk.reg.gardening Exists
uk.rec.gardening.allottments Proposed
In that case why stop there, think of
uk.rec gardening.flowers
uk.rec.gardening.flowers.roses
uk.rec.gardening.shrubs
uk.rec.gardening.shrubs.deciduous
uk.rec.gardening.shrubs.evergreen
uk.rec.gardening.shrubs.evergreen.hardy
Uk.rec.gardening is already a very active and interesting gardening
newsgroup. It has a considerable number of participants who are de facto
allotment gardeners, and there are many interesting posts on that topic.
What on earth stops other allotment gardeners from joining the gang and
thereby helping to make an even more interesing newsgroup of URG?
I will bet a penny to the usual pile of dung that every post to the
proposed
new group will in any case be crossposted to URG.
If so, why?
There have been numerous posters on this newsgroup who have asked advice
because they are new allotment holders. urg has a very knowledgeable
subscriber base
Yes. Their questions and the ensuing discussions have been most
interesting.
and I feel that some of the newbie allotment holders may
feel a little intimidated by the skills shown here and might not wish to
ask
what might be a serious question to them,
You have just admitted that "There have been numerous posters on this
newsgroup who have asked advice because they are new allotment holders.
urg
has a very knowledgeable subscriber base", so what stops these newbies of
which you speak from asking their questions, like I do when I feel
ignorant
about something?
but feel it is trivial to the more
skilled subscriber and fail to ask.
That is a totally unwarranted feeling.
I feel that this newsgroup should encourage an allotment newsgroup and
make
sure that any new allotment holder is made aware of it in a very helpful
way
and not a case of 'There's a newsgroup for you lot, ask your question
there,
newbie' Who knows, someone here might just even be an advisor for that
newsgroup as well, is there any harm in that?
On the contrary, I would urge urglers to write in pointing out the
essential
crassness of splitting off gardening interests into a multitude of
separate
groups.
And I would urge all urglers that, if this new group comes into existence,
they should avoid having anything to do with it, in order to hasten its
demise.
Franz
Are you so worried that URG is so weak not to be able to stand some people
moving to another group?
I just CANNOT understand why you should feel so upset about this proposed
group.
To encourage others to 'hasten its demise'?
What are you on Franz? Double the dose, quickly!!!!
The quotes in this thread about Urg's charter, show that allotments are not
specifically INCLUDED, this alone may
may be why people see a need for a new group. Either way fear is no reason
to try and stop the formation of this proposed group.
I for one will vote in favour of its formation, so thats 2 uk. gardening
groups I could subscribe to, wheres the problem?
Anthony
|