Did not say it was behind the tree. I said he cut it to one side, but
wound up on the opposite side and would have had to go back behind
the tree to get to his cleared safety path............


On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:39:30 GMT, "Stephen M. Henning"
wrote:

(Roy) wrote:
===
=== He had a safety path cleared, but
=== he was on the opposite side and had to go around the back side of the
=== tree to get to it.
===
===That is not a safety path, that is just a path. A safety path never
===goes behind a tree. That is the area a person is intent on getting away
===from.

Visit my website: http://www.frugalmachinist.com
Opinions expressed are those of my wifes,
I had no input whatsoever.
Remove "nospam" from email addy.