cacahuates wrote in :
escapee wrote:
I did hear our friendly drug addict just yesterday thanking his fans,
profusely, for being "there" for him over the last 15 and a half
(can't forget the half) years. He, Hannity and the other O' talk
about the "lib" network as if it's not being heard by anyone! Oh
well. They say Franken is in denial. Denial of what, I wonder. Does
Al Franken have a drug problem?
A perfect example of why liberals are morally bankrupt. A few minutes
ago you lamented Tommy Chong's being arrested for selling a bong,
thereby implying that smoking illegal herbs was somehow OK. Now you
imply that Rush Limbaugh, who had a problem with prescription drugs,
is unfit to be on the air. Are you saying drugs are fine if Tommy
Chong partakes, but bad if Limbaugh does?
I don't know whether or not you have a drug problem, but you sure do
have a credibility problem.
Rush Limbaugh: "And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs,
they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to
be sent up." -- Rush Limbaugh show, Oct. 5, 1995
Rush Limbaugh's attorneys: Drug addicts ought to be accused, enter a
plea bargain and get sent off to a nice friendly treatment center
(
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...rld/2001842882
_rush24.html)
So, V the truth of the matter is, you're probably not so much morally
bankrupt, as financially indisposed to afford lawyers who can talk out of
your ass for you.
cacahuates, as 'perfect examples' go, I suppose you are Right. Selling
drug paraphenalia that could be used to 'get high' IS the same as lying
to support a perscription drug addiction. Yessiree, it's exactly the
same. Certainly, it is 'morally' 'wrong', or wait, did I get 'morally'
confused with 'legally' again? oh, well, these days they should be
pretty much the same.
P.S. If I offered to sell a gun to a veteran, does that mean I'm implying
that killing people is okay? I just want to know, I wouldn't want to do
something that is morally bankrupt and I'm obviously not good at thinking
for myself.