Anonymous wrote:

-snip-
If you'll search the archives of this newsgroup you'll see that I've been
advocating / vigorously defending this for quite some time. Moreover, I
have referenced the U of H study all along. The article you guys are
linking to is hardly new information.

You being 'Anonymous' and all, that isn't as easy as you make it seem.
I *think* this is probably you posting as
)" last year in Message-ID:



To which Paghat answered with a reasoned rebuttal of the whole
coffee/slug debate & posted her website which cites follow up studies
which disagree with UofH--
http://www.paghat.com/coffeeslugs.html

-snip-
I have taken a lot of vary public flack about this and most certainly DID
publish my findings -- right here -- so I am not getting a warm fuzzy
feeling right now at seeing this gussied up report.

That link is about two years behind this newsgroup and nearly three years
behind ME.

So lets see your study-- give us a message ID or at least what your
email address was back in those days.

Jim