View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old 04-06-2004, 04:07 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default new Harry Potter film

It wasnt as good as the first. like MIB 2 wasnt as good as the original. but at
least they didnt put in a Kafkaeske overtones and make it an "edgier" movie.
a lot of the critics use terminology when describing this HP that is really a cover
for all that it lacks.
England is lush and green and foggy and that is why it is a good setting for magical,
for Stonehenge, for the Arthurian tales. Cuaron created this overly bright, rocky
steep sloped setting and light it so that every pimple shows. on everything.
everything looks old and old in a worn out and unloved way.
double yeck. Ingrid

"Benign Vanilla" wrote:
What about Shrek 2?

BV.




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List Manager: Puregold Goldfish List
http://puregold.aquaria.net/
www.drsolo.com
Solve the problem, dont waste energy finding who's to blame
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unfortunately, I receive no money, gifts, discounts or other
compensation for all the damn work I do, nor for any of the
endorsements or recommendations I make.