flaw in Darwin Evolution grafted rootstock
Are you just realizing that?
Archie has been posting crazy nonsense to this newsgroup for years. He is a
rather harmless kook and he makes an easy whipping boy because he is such a
misinformed delusional fool.
Archie is the poster boy for deviant de-evolution
"Are we not men? We are DEVO!"
"Christopher Green" wrote in message
om...
Archimedes Plutonium wrote in message
...
14 Jun 2004 07:48:46 -0700 Christopher Green wrote:
(snipped)
No, it may have a much greater viability with a "bird gut dependency".
Seeds that require a pass through a digestive tract, or a fire, or a
freeze and thaw are generally also well protected and will survive
harsh conditions in dormancy. They will receive better dispersal or
germinate under better conditions, and so will end up with a greater
yield.
--
Chris Green
No, this is a flaw in Darwin Evolution theory. Your above is another
example of "postdiction" of Darwin
Evolution. This particular flaw is that of "generalist" versus
"specialist" and that when a plant or
animal becomes too specialist faces the quick road to extinction. If you
look at the record of species
gone extinct it is replete with specialists, seldom any generalist.
That is merely silly. You know nothing of what you speak.
--
Chris Green
|