P van Rijckevorsel wrote:

Archimedes Plutonium schreef
May I interject environment into the above.

+ + +
You can interject it, but that does not make it relevant
+ + +

It is the environment itself that is forcing and shaping plant and animal
species

+ + +
There is quite a bit of literature on adaptation
+ + +

to go down a path of becoming too specialist or too generalist.

+ + +
The question of "too" is a different matter entirely
+ + +

But then Darwin Evolution does not count the "factor of environment".

+ + +
You must have the wrong Evolution Theory then
+ + +

So Darwin Evolution is flawed on that account.

+ + +
? ? ?
+ + +

+ + +
As algorithms are something entirely different from rules of thumb, you
may want to choose which you mean?
+ + +

Well Ohms law is not a law of physics. It is a algorithm or rule of thumb.
A slide-ruler ( remember those old cumbersome instruments of the 1970s) is
an algorithm for finding a math answer but seldom gives you the precise and
accurate answer that a math computation gives.

+ + +
Perhaps you should get somebody to introduce you to the concept of
"dictionary" and help you look up words?
+ + +

Let us not be focused on semantics of words, theory, true, false when we
need to focus on Darwin Evolution.

+ + +
That sounds like good advice. Maybe you should take it?
PvR

It is sad to see people in science who become unable to question their beliefs,
their understanding of theories. Who go on and quip and quip.

How PvR embraces Darwin Evolution as an absolute truth reminds me of the people
who embraced the theories before Darwin Evolution as the truth and who quiped
and attacked and defended the prevailing theories of their day. Never able to
engage in a discussion of the cracks and holes of the theory.

For example, the species Homo sapiens alone contradicts Darwin Evolution. We
can biotech and engineer species that is in blatant contradiction to all the 4
tenets of Darwin Evolution. Where a single species is determining what other
species will go extinct and what species will be propagated. In fact, there is
a moment in history where the human species transcended the tenets of Darwin
Evolution theory. That alone should raise the minds of so called scientists to
question the gaps, the cracks and the flaws of Darwin Evolution theory. Darwin
Evolution theory no longer applies to humanity. But I need minds sharper and
better than those of a quiping quipper of PvR to debate such.

And in the long run, I know I am correct and PvR is incorrect because I have a
physics experiment already done and established. The John Bell Inequality with
the Aspect experimental results. Superdeterminism won. Darwin Evolution is fake
and only needs time before it is trashcanned into the dustbins of history along
with Lamarkianism along with Bible Creationism along with the thousands of
other fake theories of science where millions of PvR types so proudly quipped
and defended.

It is sad that rigidity of mind is not more of a deterrant to those that enter
science fields as a profession. This is also for Chris Green, and moreso,
because I am guessing PvR is far older than Chris. It goes to show that in
science, the people who stay in science are governed more by the psychology of
wanting to be a member of a "group" rather than the quality of wanting to be
"logical and rational in thought". Science favors its members who are logical
and not so worried about being a member of a countryclub of Darwin believers.
Countryclub believers never change or create science for it requires the
ability to notice and see gaps and cracks in the existing theories. If Chris is
younger then there is some hope that he can grow out of his present
groupie-ship of Darwin.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.archimedesplutonium.com
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies