NOT like that literary genuis, Ronald Reagan, eh?

Well, there you go again!!

Kill a Commie for Mommie!!!


wrote in message
...
This is intellectually illiterate.

But true!

Half true at best. The stories are similar on a few points,
coincidentally the only ones you'd choose to broadcast. I won't ask you
if you know the points where the divergences are huge, of course you
won't know them. Even on points of similarity, the Hebraic revelations
of creation are the only ones with which with the findings of modern
science consistently comport (www.reasons.org). As to "messianic"
stories, indeed knowledge was in the world of the coming of a savior
long before he came. The Bible is clear on this. That versions of this
amazing prophecy appears in the myths of most civilizations is not a
disproof of Christ as you contend but evidence of it's universal
significance to mankind. So, the question is today as it was six
thousand years ago. Which messiah, if any, is the real one? That's the
wonder of the exceptional quality of free will that God gave only to his
Adamic creation: everybody here gets to pick his messiah. That you
despise the one called Jesus is boringly clear. It's also clear you're
too much a fool to realize you'll soon be conjuring your own messiah to
unify a troubled world as you see it. Speaking of plagarism, from whence
do you think liberalism's twisted materialist egalitarianism originally
derived, Marx? Carter?

"Liberalism is the only religion where gratitude is a sin."