On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 02:24:20 GMT, "Vox Humana" wrote:

(snip)
Actually, Kerry has said that he would raise taxes on the wealthy and that
would include his wife.

Yes, Kerry has said MANY things(as well as the opposite of those many things).
Do you really expect him to actually raise taxes on the wealthy? I don't. Even
if he does manage to do that, I wouldn't be too surprised if the wealthy still
manage to find ways to get out of paying more taxes anyway.

You give me the impression that the choice is
between a big spending Kerry and a thrifty Bush.

Nope, I don't see it a a choice between Kerry and Bush. I see it as a choice
between ALL the candidates on the ballot.

That simply isn't the
case. Bush is such a huge spender that even the truly conservative (as
opposed to the neo-cons) are starting to revolt. Bush has already spent
money that will come from future taxes - taxes that will be paid by you and
your children. Unfortunately Bush has decided to spend your money on a war
in Iraq. More money is being spent to rebuild that country while people go
without here. The defense contractors and the Carlisle Group are raking in
your tax money as we speak. Money for social programs is being ****ed away
on "faith based" programs that are about as sound as witchcraft and alchemy.
Given the choice between socialism and fascism, I'll take socialism. You
can have Bush's "big Brother" state.

I prefer neither of those choices.