On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 20:27:01 -0700, remove munged
wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:32:24 GMT, (The Watcher)
wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:45:37 -0700, Tom Jaszewski wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:13:12 GMT, (The Watcher)
wrote:

calling them kids seems a bit disingenious.


Kids pure and simple! they're kids!

And that includes the senior NCO's in their late 30's?


75 were 19 0r under

179 were less than 20 and under

534 were under 25 or under

279 were over 30

MOST WERE KIDS!!!!!

Yep, good emotional label to use for people old enough to vote for president,
drink alcohol, kill for their country, die for their country, get married, have
children, and do everything else anyone who's reached the age of majority can
do.
I prefer to avoid emotional arguments like that, especially when discussing
logical questions.