Some folks said, in discussing the Iraq war......

calling them kids seems a bit disingenious.


Kids pure and simple! they're kids!

And that includes the senior NCO's in their late 30's?


75 were 19 0r under

179 were less than 20 and under

534 were under 25 or under

279 were over 30

MOST WERE KIDS!!!!!

Yep, good emotional label to use for people old enough to vote for
president,
drink alcohol, kill for their country, die for their country, get married,
have
children, and do everything else anyone who's reached the age of majority
can
do.
I prefer to avoid emotional arguments like that, especially when
discussing
logical questions.


Oh my........i really tried to not respond.......but.......a logical
argument that i would make is that the lives of the men and women lost in
the current Iraq war are a great loss to the nation, their families, their
communities, and the value of our heritage. To dismiss such numbers based
on a pretense of the numbers being emotional is NOT logical. It's a great
loss......! Especially in a war that 'dub' chose to take the country into,
in a pre-emptive strike based on what he now says was bad intelligence. I
think the loss is very logical and very sad.........from a logical point of
view.

cubanpole