On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:38:28 GMT, escapee wrote:

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:23:21 GMT, (The Watcher) opined:

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:04:33 GMT, escapee wrote:

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:47:57 GMT, (The Watcher) opined:


No, Kerry seems more likely to run the government based on some unrealistic idea
of a Nanny State, with big dreams involving the government doing everything for
everybody. Of course, somebody is going to have to pay for that, and I don't see
Kerry raiding his wife's trust funds, so he'll have to get the money from the
liberal's favorite source, the taxpayers. No problem. American taxpayers have
deep pockets. :/

How is that any worse than the pandering to corporate America by our current
administration?


And how is it better?

I guess when you don't know the answer, you ask another question.

Sometimes when you don't know the answer you just don't answer the question,
right?