"Vox Humana" wrote in message
...
"Sheila" wrote in message
...
dykerider wrote:
"Helen Crames" wrote in message
newsgBUc.276159$%_6.32608@attbi_s01...
Isn't abortion much more expensive than birth control?
Helen
Not if the government pays for it.
Why should the government pay for it?
Its a red herring argument. It appeals to people who want to denigrate
what
they perceive as a "welfare class." While most people on public
assistance
are white, "welfare queen" (i.e., "the government pays for it") is code
for
"unmarried, black woman with children." While I know that OP will
strongly
protest, that statement has racist as well as classist overtones. It also
tries to assert that the government SHOULDN'T" pay for a legal medical
procedure because it is against a particular religious point of view. The
neo-conservative agenda doesn't accept the role of government in any way
that doesn't involve the defense industry or war. Therefore, this is a
trifecta of insults.
The NeoCons don't want the government paying for abortion because it
acknowledges the existence of sex for purposes other than procreation. Uh
oh.