"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:31:18 +0000 (UTC), "Franz Heymann"
wrote:

Down to here you spoke a great deal of sense. However, you are wrong
about the release of radioactive gases into the air by nuclear power
stations. In normal operation, nuclear power stations do not release
any radioactive gases into the air at all.

******
That's good news!. I'm off to report to the people of Ravenglass and
West Cumberland , - that the failure of the nuclear chimneys,
deliberately left chucking out radio-active filth because our dear Prime
Minister was dependant on the US for certain elements for the nuke subs,
was not responsible for the mass leukaemia deaths of their children, and
the pouring into the sea of thousands of gallons of milk was because
somenone had peed into the churns. And it wasn't Cherobyl that still
pollutes the grass around here. They will be comforted' I'm sure -
just as I am because my wife was one ot the many victims of leukaemia ,
she survived, but her life was altered for the worse but many young
friends who were suddenly struck died early horrible deaths as a result.
My doctors were the first to call alarm but they were visited . (By
sick patients, - of course!.)
Doug.
******




As a matter of fact, the
old coal fired power stations *did* release a considerable amount of
radioactive materials into the atmosphere, but it was not considered
polite to mention that fact.

Ha ha ha ha ha!!! I've got them arguing amongst themselves now.

Trust a kraut to stick his nose in and make a dolt of himself.
:-)))))

--
Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy
@despammed.com