23-08-2004, 04:45 PM
|
|
|
(IntarsiaCo) wrote in message ...
Many people are not used to Democrats or Liberals or
anyone outside their primitive agenda, speaking out or giving quotations, or
citation on any information to rebuke their false claims.
John Kerry said:
"I would like to talk, representing all those veterans, and say that several
months ago in Detroit, we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably
discharged and many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes
committed in Southeast Asia, not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a
day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of
command....
They told the stories at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off
heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the
power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed
villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun,
poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in
addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very particular
ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country"
Truth, false claims, nuanced position, or perhaps slander? No wonder those
Swift boat vets are ****ed off.
You mean the Swift Boat Liars for Bush?
The one who claimed to have treated Kerry but didn't?
The one who at the time of the incident said it demonstrated Kerry's
courage and leadership but now says it was proof of his impulsiveness?
The one who now denies that Kerry was under fire, but whose own bronze
star citation for the same action refers to constant enemy fire?
The ones who didn't actually serve with Kerry, but now claim they did?
J. Del Col
|