01-09-2004, 01:25 AM
|
|
|
(Michael Capone) wrote in message . com...
Hi Folks,
Been doing a lot of reading lately on the concrete vs. 45-mil liner
issue when setting up a fish pond. I'd like to ask the question in a
slightly different way:
Assume that money is no object (for the moment, at least; I'm sure
I'll come to my senses soon...) Also, assume that I don't have to set
it up myself (I have a competent fish pond installer who can go either
route, and is at this very moment sitting around waiting for me to
make up my mind on which direction to go). Given those two criteria,
I'd like to know, which pond bottom is best in the long run? Since
ease of installation is not a concern, I'd like to hear from people
who have had to live with one or the other for some time. Is
maintenance easier on one or the other? Is one "prettier" than the
other (highly subjective, I know). Does algae grow on concrete and
not come off?
I should mention that I live near San Jose, CA; earthquakes can
happen, although I'm not sure how big a deal this is. I don't get the
extreme temperatures, though (freezing nights are relatively rare,
though it can get up to 100 F on occasion). There are no tree roots
anywhere nearby that I have to worry about.
So, thoughts? Thanks in advance for any input. I've been tearing my
hair out over this crazy issue. Thanks!
Michael
Hi Brian,Just had a 15 x 20 x 3 pond built in my yard.Dig hole then
sub liner then 45 mil liner then large rocks with sub liner under then
1 1/2" of portland cement with forterier and renforcing fiber mix in a
colorant and it loooks gr8.lots of large rocks see my pictures
|