How about just letting the critters whose territory you moved into
stay and learn to live?

ding ding!!! I think we have a winner!



"remove munged" wrote in message
...
Because releasing is certain slow death, but a good solution for the
emotionally handicapped unwilling to take responsibility for their
actions. Certainly shooting the poor creature in the head would be far
more humane!

How about just letting the critters whose territory you moved into
stay and learn to live?


On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:25:35 -0400, "Stunk Pidasso"
wrote:

It's a woodchuck, people. Not a great white. What's wrong with letting
it
go in a non-residential area? Is it more manly to shoot it in his furry
little head? ::eyeroll::
The more people I meet, the more I like my dog....
Lori --- not a PW'd husband



"remove munged" wrote in message
.. .
Yeah there's a slug of cattle ranchers posting to this thread.....

Actually the issue seems to be a pussy whipped husband with some
delusions about not killing immediately, rather the illogical moving
and slow death is preferred to continued whipping...



On 24 Sep 2004 08:12:23 -0700, (J. Del Col)
wrote:

"Stu Pidasso" wrote in message
...
Guns don't kill woodchucks, idiots do....

Ask any cattle rancher or horse owner about woodchucks.

Unless you extirpate the beasts, they'll dig holes that can cripple
cattle and horses. Either shoot the woodchucks or shoot the cows or
horses after they break their legs. Your choice, ace.

J. Del Col