P van Rijckevorsel wrote:

Archimedes Plutonium schreef
The reason I say this is because in
history trebuchets were built out of oak and not hickory even though
England had hickory species and ash species.

***
England has no hickory species (perhaps you are confusing England with
China), but yes hickory is stronger than oak. A matter of record.
PvR

I was confusing Butternut as being a Carya species.

But never mind my mistake.

It is more important to be able to use the Genome Project on the two ash
species since they are so similar. To use that A,C,T,G coding as if it
was a fossil record itself. To decipher from the A,C,T,G which came
first, the Green Ash or the White Ash and which mutated giving rise to
the other species.

The Genome Project is relatively new and has a huge potential of being a
fossil recorder of the ancient geological past history. Those A,C,T,G
codings should be able to date one species from another species and tell
us which was the parent-species.

This should be of great importance to the science of anthropology in that
we can unravel the A,C,T,G that is bipedalism and why chimps do not have
bipedalism and thus work backwards showing that chimps throw underarm but
not overarm and because throwing precedes bipedalism. So as the chimps
continue to get better at throwing they eventually (given about 2 to 3
million years and if humans were not around to extinct them) will become
bipedal from their throwing behaviour.

I pick on the Ash species to make a Genome-Fossil check because I am
guessing that the genome of WhiteAsh to GreenAsh is almost identical.
Moreso than the genome difference between chimpanzee and human.

Sometime in the future there will be a stunning news report that uses the
Genome of one species to indicate the evolutionary history of a similar
species. That uses the Genome as a Fossil record. And I think Ash would
be a nice candidate.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies