Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:08:16 GMT Sean Houtman wrote:
(huge snip)

Archimedes Plutonium wrote in
:

I am trying to think of an analogy for animals in the manner that
compound leaves are to trees.

Fur, feathers, scales on the heat protection side, and multiple
stomachs as cows have on the food obtaining side. These analogies
are kind of forced though. Maybe they are extremely forced. OK, they
are so forced that they are silly.


So that is a nice compounding for animals. The compounding of hair into
that of multi-hair which ends up as becoming feathers.

So then, since compounding is a ongoing phenomenon for both the Plant
Kingdom as well as the Animal Kingdom that we must ask the question as
to what is the source of this tendency to compound within biological
kingdoms.

Darwin Evolution would spring in to say that the source for the tendency
or proclivity to compound in Nature is due to the fact that DNA is
itself a compound symmetry for it is not a single helix but a double
helix. In other words, Darwin Evolution would claim the source for the
proclivity to compound comes from the molecule of heredity itself-- the
double helix DNA.

However, a far different answer for Compounding tendency or Compounding
proclivity in the kingdoms of biology swells forth from Quantum Dualism
of Quantum Physics in that the kingdoms are complimentary duals of one
another of the plant kingdom dual to the animal kingdom where particles
have their respective reverses. Charge negative versus charge positive,
and matter versus antimatter, and spin up or spin down. Symmetry is
created in the world and in particular the biological-world not because
DNA is symmetrical but because quantum dualism forces there to be
symmetry everywhere and in everything.

So life on Earth in a million years hence in the future, if it survives
will have compounded in ways hardly imagineable to us today.

But getting back to the past history of life. If Darwin was correct then
the symmetry we see so much in life is caused fundamentally because DNA
is symmetrical. But if I am correct then Darwin is deaf dumb and silent
as to how DNA itself was created and that is where Quantum Duality has
the better answers.

Did the Ash leaves evolve compound leaves or did birds evolve feathers
by compounding hair due to the tendency of DNA to mutate symmetrical
endproducts? Or is it a better explanation to say that all beneficial
mutations possess symmetry not because DNA possess symmetry but because
the forces creating mutations are quantum physics so that when the first
eye mutations occurred in living systems they came as 2 and not 1 or
when the first lungs came they arrived as 2 and not 1 or when the first
heart arrived it came as 2 chambered and not 1. Much as in physics when
a electron appears there is also its proton somewhere else or when a
antimatter appears there is its matter somewhere else.

So symmetry is something that Darwin Evolution is deaf dumb and silent
about. Whereas the theory of Quantum Duality of kingdoms of biology says
that symmetry is forced unto living systems because the creation process
of new things in biology is a result of complimentary dualism.


Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies