Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:22:41 +0200 P van Rijckevorsel wrote:

Archimedes Plutonium schreef
So that is a nice compounding for animals. The compounding of hair into
that of multi-hair which ends up as becoming feathers.

*****
Right, birds and plants with compound leafs are birds of a feather
* * *

So then, since compounding is a ongoing phenomenon for both the Plant
Kingdom as well as the Animal Kingdom that we must ask the question as
to what is the source of this tendency to compound within biological
kingdoms.

*****
Energy efficiency
* * *

That would be a Darwin Evolution answer by looking for some advantage for
survival.

But the Quantum-Duality answer is far deeper. It would say that every
biological system is symmetrical. And there is a force tendency to compound. In
physics when we view a photo for a particle path that curves leftward then the
antiparticle takes a rightward path which in toto is symmetrical. The same idea
applies to biological systems that when plants create single leafs they are
symmetrical but there is this underlying Quantum duality force seeking compound
leaves.

Physics is lacking in understanding of the interconnectedness between Symmetry
and Complimentary duality.

To date the mathematicians have been largely ignorant and their thoughts and
ideas on this subject are so offbase and remote with fractal theory as to be
ludicrous.

Biology however is the best field to pinpoint this basic concept that Quantum
duality and symmetry are driving forces in all of biology.

Every specimen of life that I can think of is overwhelmingly symmetrical, as if
there is a underlying force to produce symmetry and to compound that symmetry.

As if the Ash tree leaflets were some particle photographed with a rightward
path and another leaflet was the antiparticle with leftward path.



Darwin Evolution would spring in to say that the source for the tendency
or proclivity to compound in Nature is due to the fact that DNA is
itself a compound symmetry for it is not a single helix but a double
helix.

*****
Darwin did not know about DNA and certainly had nothing to say about it
* * *

I know Darwin did not know about DNA, and evolution cannot contradict the facts
of DNA. But can Darwin Evolution explain the birth of DNA and the rise of DNA?
Some people have seen repeating of clay minerals as a model for the birth of
DNA.

I say DNA was borne on Earth from a neutrino of a cosmic ray with about 10^14
MeV that was stopped and when stopped transformed into a whole creature. In
this sense light-waves are perfect DNA and when stopped the lightwaves convert
to DNA and a whole creature.

Then because of Quantum duality as a force of symmetry such as compounding
these creatures produce new species.



So life on Earth in a million years hence in the future, if it survives
will have compounded in ways hardly imagineable to us today.

*****
Evolution moves slowly, but who knows how the influence of Man wiil work out
* * *

The influence of man should tell the intelligent thinking person that Darwin
Evolution is a poor model at best. Because humanity itself can extinct or
create new species in total violation of the tenets of Darwin Evolution of
geographic isolation, of Natural Selection, of genetic recombination, etc etc.
Humanity itself contradicts Darwin Evolution.


Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies