Sun, 24 Oct 2004 03:23:27 GMT Sean Houtman wrote:
(most snipped)



But I wonder about some other facts, perhaps you could enlighten
me upon. I know animals are primarily protein bodies. So if a
average animal is 70% water
and then say 20% protein. But plants have little protein. So an
average plant is say 70% water then what is the 20% analog of
protein?

Your experiments with Ash, Oak, and Hickory should tell you the
answer to that question.


Yes plants have cellulose which has glucose in contrast with starch.

But I need a firm data sheet as to how much proteins the average animal
consists of. Does the average animal contain 20% proteins. Then does the
average plant consist of roughly the same 20% of cellulose?

Then, can we say that cellulose is just sugar and can we thence say that
the dual of protein is sugar? I am not sure.

Can we say that photosynthesis end goal is to create sugar. And since
animals live indirectly off of photosynthesis, not directly as plants
do, that their bulk 20% is proteins whose end goal is to create food.

So in this light, can we say that sugars are the dual of proteins and
that plants consist on average 70% water, 20% cellulose and 10% other
whereas animals on average consist 70% water, 20% proteins and 10%
other.

So that the numbers match and leaves us with the undeniable insight that
plants are dual to animals where one has sugar and the other has
proteins, and both driven by DNA.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies