Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

someone wrote:


Sorry, I don't buy it. Your theory is just a bunch of hand waving.
You have to keep rationalizing that viruses are this and bacteria are
that just to try to keep your theory together.

No, I am exploring, initial exploring but you seem too dense to see that.


There is no experiment that you can do to test your theory, and you

No, there is a great experiment of that of taking a 100% sterile life free flask or
drum and have a cosmic ray of 10^14 MeV transit the flask and if there is life
where previously there was none would prove the theory. Another route to proof
would be if Moon rocks or Mars rocks or Mercury rocks contained fossil life but
never had evolved-life.


In fact, the news today has quite a bit of information concerning cosmic rays. And I
am going to quote it in full in order to point out some missing information which will
discovered in the future.

There are too many cosmic rays to be accountable by supernova alone and these
overabundant cosmic rays, I am confident will be attributed as originating from the
Nucleus of the AtomTotality.

The below article also fails to address the twin facts of that cosmic rays are so
uniformily fluxed over the night sky and that there energies seem unlimited in that
they can pack a 10^14 MeV or even go up to a recordholding 10^21 MeV as was reported
sometime not long ago. If a cosmic ray of 10^21 MeV or higher ever was stopped near
our solar system it could extinct life of Earth.

I am not questioning that cosmic rays are produced from Supernova, for that to me is a
given. What I am questioning from this report is that cosmic rays are so much more
abundant than this report wants to admit and so uniform density in the cosmos and that
many pack energies that supernova source is not the full picture. I contend that some
come from supernova but the majority come from the Nucleus of the AtomTotality of
231Pu.

And in context with this thread on Quantum Dual of Biology. An experiment such as the
Fly-Eye conducted in the desert of Utah should be extended to searching for a device
or equipment where a cosmic ray is captured in a container that is 100% absent of life
forms such as even viral DNA. Because I speculate that such a device will find a new
viral or bacterial DNA after a cosmic ray transits the device. I contend that when a
cosmic ray of 10^14 MeV is stopped in a device that a new virus or bacteria will be
found wherein the cosmic ray neutrino has internal parts of *perfect DNA* and by
stopping the ray will dress that internal DNA and become a viral entity or new
bacteria.

Another means of doing this experiment is to find out if viruses and bacteria can be
fossilized and the Moon is lifeless but it has cosmic ray bombardment. So that a
typical pile of Moon rock should contain many viral fossils that were created from
cosmic rays.

--- quoting Reuters on cosmic ray ---

Scientists Close in on Source of Cosmic
Rays

Wed Nov 3, 1:01 PM ET


Science - Reuters



LONDON (Reuters) - An international team of astronomers
believe they have solved a
mystery that has been perplexing scientists for 100 years
-- the origin of cosmic rays.

Scientists first discovered the
energetic particles that
bombard the Earth nearly a
century ago but where they
come from has been one of the
big questions in
astrophysics.

Using an array of four
telescopes in Africa, the
scientists produced the first
image showing that the
source of cosmic rays could be
the remnant of a
supernova, a powerful explosion
of a star at the end of
its life.

"This is the first time we were
able to take an image of
the source," David Berge, an
astrophysicist at the Max
Planck Institute in Heidelberg,
Germany, told Reuters.

Scientists had long thought
that supernova explosions
were indeed the source, but did
not have evidence to
support it, according to Berge,
who reported the
findings in the science journal
Nature.

He and colleagues from Britain, Armenia, France, Ireland,
Namibia, South Africa and the
Czech Republic studied the remnant of a supernova that
exploded about 1,000 years ago
and left a shell of debris.

"Because the energy density in cosmic rays is so large,
they play an important role in the
development of our galaxy," said Berge.

"We are now at a stage where we seem to be able to prove
cosmic rays come from
supernova remnants."

Professor Ian Halliday, head of the Particle Physics and
Astronomy Research Council
(PPARC) which funds research, welcomed the findings.

"These results provide the first unequivocal proof that
supernovae are capable of
producing large quantities of galactic cosmic rays --
something we have long suspected,
but never been able to confirm," he said in a statement.
--- end quoting ---

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies