View Single Post
  #184   Report Post  
Old 19-11-2004, 08:52 AM
Roger Pearse
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(paghat) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Roger Pearse) wrote:

Larry Blanchard wrote in message

...
In article ,
says...
A devottee of a single Christian sect remains so by being blind to &
rejecting the full range of belief. I do not claim to be an authority,
though, just have a deeper interest than dunderheads who blame their
prejudices & sillier observations on their religion, when they obviously
learned only enough about faith to justify hating whatever they already
hated.

Bring back Mithras! It's all a bunch of bull anyway :-).

Sorry, couldn't resist that one :-).


Glad to see someone else can see the possibilities. "Get rid of the
bull, with Mithras"

All the best,

Roger Pearse


Mithras is just another resurrected divinity like Tamuz and Jesus. A rose
by any other name is still just a fertility daemon worshipped as god. so
Mithras worship is still very much with us. Nothing wrong with that, only
whimsical that modern Mithras-Tamuz-Jesus worshippers think there's a
difference.


Your statements about the cult of Mithras are imaginary. Mithras was
not resurrected.

All the best,

Roger Pearse