View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old 14-01-2005, 05:07 AM
Richard
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Eric McGlohon wrote:
In article , Richard wrote:
Well, there's one way to find out for su get one new one and compare it
to the old ones. The anal retentive and wealthy re-tube at 6 mos. I just
use twice the number of tubes and replace them when they burn out.


It would seem to me that's not a very cheap solution, the extra
electricity costs will outweigh the replacement costs of the bulb...


Look at GE's publshed devay curves, it never goes below 50% so I
come out ahead, sorta. We have the cheapest electricity in the
world here.

But, occasionallyll splurge and spend a whopping $7 on a new pair of tubes
so I can't say I really have dim lights.

The 6-month guideline is generally only for super-light hungry reef
tanks (which I also keep) - and even that is up for argument. In
my planted tanks I replace my bulbs about every year or so, by then
there's a significant -and noticeable even to the naked eye- drop
in light output. My plants sure do grow like crazy after a bulb
change.


Sure, they've never so bright as the first week. Freshwater or
marine there's no such thing as too much light, just not enoiugh plants :-)

--
Need Mercedes parts ? - http://parts.mbz.org
http://www.mbz.org | Mercedes Mailing lists: http://lists.mbz.org
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | Killies, killi.net, Crypts, aquaria.net
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Old wris****ches http://watches.list.mbz.org