On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:41:19 +0100, "Tumbleweed"
wrote:


"Malcolm Kane" wrote in message
...
In message ,
writes
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:47:22 +0100, "Tumbleweed"
wrote:


"Paul" wrote in message
...
Why do the RSPB and other conservation hooligan charities such as the
Woodland Trust kill wildlife rather than manage it properly. We all
know killing large numbers of animals merely causes them to breed more
and quicker.

Thats must be why there are lots of whales then?

No, It is always possible to slaughter a species almost to extinction.


But surely Angus when the main pressure was taken off a number of years
ago this principle you have quoted before that it causes faster breeding
would by now have been making a really noticeable difference.
--
Malcolm Kane

As far as I can understand from Angus, if people kill deer then the
population increases, but if (say) wolves kill deer, then the population
decreases or remains the same. And if people kill whales the population
falls, but if they kill deer the population increases. And if the main cause
of death of deer is starvation because there is no predation of any kind,
and no free deer condom vending machines provided, then there are the right
number of deer. Or something.

This just confirms you're a prat then.