Martin Sykes wrote:
This may be a bit mercenary, but wouldn't Darwinism support an
argument for just not worrying about .........

........supplying chicks with small but contaminated nut pieces

............... on the grounds that the birds can differentiate what is
and what is not good for them.

This really is the nanny state taking over. How ever did the birds
survive before we superior humans evolved to look after them?

--
ned