On 5/6/05 17:29, in article ,
"martin" wrote:

On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:34:36 +0100, Janet Baraclough
wrote:

The message
from martin contains these words:

On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 11:57:59 +0100, "Mike Lyle"
wrote:

martin wrote:
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:10:03 +0100, Sacha
wrote:

On 4/6/05 15:39, in article
,
"Spider" wrote:


Glenda wrote in message
[...]
10 Years! Coronation Street Weekly Updates for th'Internet
http://www.corrieweeklyupdates.btinternet.co.uk
[...]
is. I hope the director got a thrill out of it - we were even
further incensed by this waste of our licence money.

Coronation Street isn't funded by your license money.

Nobody said it was, dimwit.

I believe the BBC gets a steady flow of complaints about ITV
programmes!

From Sacha? :-)

You really should pay more attention to what appears on your own
screen, and who put it there.

"10 Years! Coronation Street Weekly Updates for th'Interne
http://www.corrieweeklyupdates.btinternet.co.uk"

was posted by Glenda underneath her own topical post. It's her
usual sig, not a comment on this thread or the BBC. Spider replied to
Glenda's post, quoting it in full. Sacha replied to Spider's remarks,
not to Glenda's sig.

Whoever posted
" I hope the director got a thrill out of it - we were even
further incensed by this waste of our licence money."
was criticising the BBC.

Yes, that was me. But I mentioned nothing about any other programme on any
channel.
--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove the weeds to email me)