View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Old 12-06-2005, 10:21 AM
Nick Maclaren
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Jaques d'Alltrades wrote:

I had do a double-think when you said 'goosefoot' - it's just not a
problem here. Just shows the difference in our soils.


Yes. I have thought of growing it deliberately, because it is really
quite a good spinach-like plant and doesn't have the difficulties of
spinach. I keep meaning to try its seeds, and see what they taste
like. But it does like light soils and dryish conditions.


I collect it (and fat hen) in the fields round here, by the carrier-bag.
I've still got some in the freezer from last year. And the soil round
here is far from light or sandy...


Interesting. Do you know the Latin names of those plants? As I
understand it, goosefoot = fat hen = Chenopodium album, but I can
easily believe that there are variations in usage.

It does like a rich soil, and will delight in an old muck-heap.


True. Or a compost heap :-)

The whole of the tops go in the pot, seeds and all, but they do need to
be young and tender: the mature seeds are not what I would call
scrumptious.


I may still try anyway, but thanks for the information :-)

I don't know why it has never been domesticated. It is a neolithic
food plant and, as we agree, is in no way inferior to spinach as a
food crop. Most pseudo-spinaches are very coarse, but it isn't.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.