"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Vox Humana" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Vox Humana" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Vox Humana" wrote in message
...

"Rod & Betty Jo" wrote in message
...

"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message
...
Well done.

Since I was simply addressing a blanket and rather ignorant
statement
"
It
is never the animal's fault. Never. It is always the fault of
the
people who leave animals out to bark incessantly" .......The
statement
had
no qualifier for time, duration or circumstance.....one could
surmise
a
barking dog for 10 minutes as easily as 10 hours (both can be
rather
irritating)....as it is dogs bark...its what they do...and just
because
a
dog barks the owner does not inherently deserve the subsequently
proffered
penalties.

I think assigning "fault" to a dog for barking is at best
pointless.
Under
the right circumstances a dog will bark. If your only point is to
place
blame and not come to a resolution, then blaming a dog for baking
would
meet
your goal. On the other hand, if you goal is to resolve the noise
problem,
then the only rational conclusion is to find fault with the owner
for
not
managing the problem. A barking dog will seldom, if ever, take
steps
to
make the neighborhood quite. The dog has other goals. Gun owner
will
quickly point out that guns don't kill people, people kill people.
Blaming
a gun for making noise or killing people is exactly the same as
blaming
a
dog for barking. We could argue into eternity about whether guns
kill
people and not change the fact that tens of thousands of people
are
killed
by guns each year, just as you could blame a dog for barking and
not
make
things even a tiny bit quieter.



Please post the number for the telephone that rings closest to your
bed.
We'll wake YOU up at odd hours for a week or two and see if it
changes
your
tune. :-)

Why? You would be better off calling the police or your attorney to
deal
with noise problems rather than throw fule on the fire by duplicating
the
irresponsible behavior of the pet owner.

Try that sometime and let me know how it goes, OK?

Quite a few animal control employees don't know how to read the riot
act
to
an irresponsible dog owner. So, they issue warnings instead of
following
the
letter of the law. In many municipalities, the law says that the dog
owner
gets three "tickets" or whatever they're called, with steadily
increasing
fines, and then the dog is removed permanently. This process can often
be
completed within a week, if the animal control person cooperates.
Instead,
it can take months, even if the violation is occurring every night.



That's the system we have. What you seem to be advocating is
lawlessness
where people simply take things into their own hands. While due process
can
be tedious, it is better than anarchy.



Disturbing someone's sleep in just one step shy of child molesting. Talk
about anarchy....

If you say so.