Cereus-validus:

Don't know what you're smoking, Ivan.

Looks as if you would have concerned at your intellectual end?

Your answer has very little to do with the original question.

Why so limited? My answer has even only to do with this topic
compared with your lie.

Again:

The further prospects of the science (the point on that your
mind seems to hang remained) represents an substantial addition
fitting in the context since this realization in the measure
changes the outdated conception of the world like it leads your
first statement ad absurdum, in which you still believe.

However you didn't understand the main point yet:
The range of the sunlight doesn't state purely nothing at all
over occurrences or concentration of photosynthesis.

Tell me, why do you mislead the OP in your learn-resistance?

Too bad you still don't know how to do a spell check, spaceman.

You come too easily from the way, worm.

BTW, what color is the sky on YOUR planet?

Clarify first the meaning of sky (in light of your posts, I
strengthens doubt your apprehension), afterwards stop your stupid TOFU.