wrote in message
oups.com...
"Perhaps you could display a little more than ignorance of Usenet and
check some of the postings from Kanter. Just an ounce of skill and
you'd find he's being spoofed...PUTZ! "

Now that Kanter has posted that he did in fact make the post, so who's
the ignorant one now, Putz?


Let's see who's thinking clearly today. Bless the assembled masses with your
conclusions from the following:

If a chemical company says they used rats to test for safety, they consider
the results valid.

If someone else uses rats, and finds the exact same chemical to be unsafe,
the chemical company says "That's not valid because rats respond differently
than humans".

This has been going on for 4 decades. What do you make of this riddle?