If you spent half as much time responding to the questions you're afraid to
answer, you might learn something. But hey...the world needs pussies, or the
brave would not stand out as much.

Here we go again:

If chemical companies use animal tests and "find" that the animals are not
harmed by chemicals, they declare the tests to be conclusive.

If another researcher uses animal tests with the exact same chemical
product, and the animals get sick, the manufacturers say animal tests are
not valid because animals don't react to chemicals in the same way as
humans.

Both cannot be correct. So, what's up with this situation?