"Doug Kanter" posted:
If chemical companies use animal tests and "find" that the animals
are not harmed by chemicals, they declare the tests to be conclusive.

If another researcher uses animal tests with the exact same chemical
product, and the animals get sick, the manufacturers say animal tests
are not valid because animals don't react to chemicals in the same
way as humans.

Both cannot be correct. So, what's up with this situation?

Or the other situation, that Ronald Reagan fires the FDA coordinator,
hires a new one on advise of his buddy Mister Aspartame (Donald
Rumsfeld), and was a Defense Contractor that worked for Donald.

Arthur Hull Hayes
FDA Commissioner
hired in 1981
fired in 1983 for accepting corporate gifts in exchange
of his approvals for drugs.
went to work for G.D. Searle & Company,
(as a medical advisor)
(Donald Rumsfeld is CEO of this company)

The approval of drug by the FDA was based upon firing the FDA
commissioner, and putting in a new commissioner that would approve
the chemical known as aspartame. He based his approval upon
reports presented by the company that manufactured aspartame,
G.D. Searle & Company (of which Donald Rumsfeld was a CEO).

Boy it sures does swing in a very tight circle there. And the guy was
FIRED for accepting gifts. He then went to work for Donald
Rumsfeld again, as a "medical professional".

That's a VERY TIGHT circle there, where the people approving
things are hired because they WILL APPROVE, and hired
because they work FOR a company that needs approval.

--
Jim Carlock
Please post replies to newsgroup.