In article ,
Mike wrote:
In article , bigboard
writes
Mike wrote:

A 'Tree Hugging' 'Net Nanny' WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!! I've seen the lot
now!!!!!!

Who doesn't really like Tree Huggers OR Net Nannies, but has found
BOTH IN ONE GO :-((((((((((((

Hello sailor, I think you're '!' key is stuck.

No. Look ! 1 OK and to prove a point 2 !!

You have a problem?
Possibly in concept?

No, but you do. Your finger and mind both appear to be stuck. I
recommend extracting the former and opening the latter.

The obscene Countryside Act may be the most abominable act of land
reiving since the Enclosures Acts, and does most definitely not do
anything useful to protect the environment. It was designed solely
to remove more rights from the public and give them to the so-called
landowners, under the guise of claiming to protect the environment,
while ensuring that it does nothing to protect the environment
against those most active in destroying it.

But that is not the point. "jon at bigboard" made a perfectly
reasonable posting, even if he has been fooled by government
propaganda. It did not justify your reponse.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren,
University of Cambridge Computing Service,
New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QH, England.
Email:
Tel.: +44 1223 334761 Fax: +44 1223 334679