"La puce" wrote in message
oups.com...

Janet Baraclough wrote:
The latter is the very essence of gardening. No, I don't think the GW
approach IS helpful. If it was, newsgroups like this one would not see
so many confused and anxious beginners desperate for failsafe
instructions. ITGOD, starting to garden was a relaxed, hit and miss
improvisation (it's still like that for me), and nobody looked to
strangers to tell one it was okay to have a lawnless garden :-)

Your comments are contradictory as always. You garden with the 'hit and
miss' do you? What has happened to all your great infalible comments
and advices?

There is endless criticism of all gardening programmes on this group
but
I've yet to see anyone define what would make a good gardening
programme. Perhaps I've missed the thread that did?

You must have, that has been discussed countless times in many
threads. Including, this one.

Well, make us two. I've never seen a thread describing what would make
a good gardening programme. BUT because Janet seen it, lets not talk
about it again. In fact we can all switch our monitors now. There's
nothing to talk about because Janet has talked about it before.

There.


That just about sums up the Barrowcloth Dictatorship to a T