On 10/11/05 17:33, in article
, "La puce"
wrote:


Sacha wrote:
Janet posted some harmless remark about 'hit and miss gardening' and you
immediately pounced on it to insult her.

(snip)

You are a liar. Janet called me a troll after my first post.

Which has nothing to do with you picking a fight with her over a perfectly
innocent post. If you intend to continue to do that with everything Janet
posts, this will be a happy little group, won't it?

My first
post! From that point on you protected Janet because I defended myself.

No, I do not protect Janet, as you so childishly call it. I comment upon
what I observe and what I observe is you being determined to be allowed to
post duff information and get away with it, and then throwing a tantrum when
that doesn't happen. You're giving every appearance of being a spoiled
brat.

You went on about my RHS. Your poor friend David Poole was so
ambarassed about your behaviour we had to stop discussing something
interesting to me but to him too. You are a disgrace and don't deserve
the friends you have. And you couldn't even start guessing who has
posted me emails. You are so deluded.

Did David Poole tell you he was embarrassed by my behaviour? And of course,
I can guess who is emailing you - I've been around this group long enough!
If it comes to that, I've had several saying what a bloody awful bore you
are. See how that works?

You call me a French bitch and if you both now regret it it's tough.

I did not call you a French bitch or anything like it and I don't regret
anything, other than your appalling behaviour.

Yes I told Janet to got back to her cauldron. Yes I said you mop after
your husband and carry cream cakes. Well don't you?! Off course you do
but that doesn't work with your ideas of grandeur doesn't it.

Ideas of grandeur? What are you on about now? Why have I got ideas of
grandeur because I object, quite reasonably, to your temper tantrum pulling
my husband into a fight that you have whipped up and which has nothing to do
with him or his business? The one with ideas above her station would appear
to be you. You think you can come here and tell everyone what to do and how
to do it and we will? Dear me, what a mistake.

You didn't know who I was, you don't know who I know, you don't know
what I do, you both are so wrapped up with your own selves you cannot
see past your noses.

I think you've missed one important thing - I don't *care*. I do know that
you're a major foot stamper with big ideas of how important she is and
that's enough, thanks.


I'd think Janet to be better than you. But you
deserve each other clearly. You are both terribly horrible people.

We are indeed - I'd steer clear of us, if I were you.

This
is a lesson to you both. I'll never be your friend.

Promise? I can't imagine how we'll get over it but I'm sure we'll both try
very, very hard to get by without your 'friendship'.

This group is not about you, you know. Let's try to remember that, shall
you?
--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove the weeds to email me)