View Single Post
  #24   Report Post  
Old 08-03-2003, 04:00 PM
Gregory Young
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aquascape and similar ponder owners

Hi all:
I have received a FD present (surprise) from my wife, of an AS ornamental
water garden. Looked pretty. I smiled, and thanked her.. then tried to
figure how I could fix it..
Found the solution.. I had her help me "clean" the pond in the spring. We
drained the pond, and cleaned the gravel (about 3 - 4 inches deep small
stone.. the usual AS addition.)
After smelling the stench (H2S primarily), my wife realized "the fish were
swimming in a septic tank" (we have one, she knows the smell when it is
drained), and agreed to allow me to remove the bottom rock/gravel.. Of
course then I convinced here we should go deeper, get bottom drains
installed, go with Koi, and it all began! Sneaky of me hugh?
The rock/gravel bottom was beautiful, and did look clean.. no disagreements
there.
You can not imagine the job I had.. using a 5 gallon bucket, with numerous
holes drilled to allow water to flow out, getting into the then 17 x 17
pond, and getting the gravel out.. 1/2 bucket at a time. It took a long
time.. esp. as they had delivered the rock with a truck, and wheelbarrowed
it in.
I got my exercise that summer!
I kept the best features AS uses (but they didn't invent them).. the
biofalls, and skimmer, but hooked in that a bead filter, added bottom drains
that feed a stream (which is designed to be trickle filter), which dumps
into bog and back into pond. 2 discrete systems, which are doing great.
I am pressed for time, so forgive me, the following is a paste of info I
sent this NG last spring on this subject.
My next post will be a reprint of a Koi USA article. Hope this all helps.
Here is one of my previous posts on gravel on the bottom of ponds:

From: "Gregory Young"
Subject: GRAVEL ON LINER IN POND??
Date: Sunday, May 20, 2001 10:31 AM

This subject stimulates a great deal of discussion, as people have opinions,
based on "what they have, or works for them", rather than based on
scientific trials/studies.
A good site that offers both sides of the argument I found is:
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rosieda...e/writing.html
A couple of points I will add to the discussion:
1) The rock "craze" comes from the very successful "Aquascape school of
ponding". The owner of Aquascape has setup a very lucrative business based
on an excellent marketing approach.. to take all of the components used to
setup water gardens, put them together in a package, and sell them to
nurseries across the country. Further they (Aquascape) offers "how to"
sessions that teach the nurseries through seminars how to install an average
pond, using their approach (they use rocks to "protect the liner bottom from
the effects of uv irradiation". Nice hype, but short wavelength uv doesn't
cause any significant damage to anything under 2 feet of water!), then state
that the average 2 foot deep pond installation can net a nursery $6,000 -
$7,500! Those numbers come from the Aquascape video which nurseries receive
when they purchase an Aquascape system. The tape encourages them to attend
an Aquascape seminar, to learn the tricks of installation, etc. Since I
don't have the video in front of me, and have only seen it once 2 years ago,
I may be slightly off on the dollar amount but I'm close enough to make my
point.
2) I dive, formerly as part of my profession, now as a hobby. I can assure
you most of the bottoms of bodies of water (except in certain areas of rock
outcroppings), are not covered with rock! They are covered with sediment,
which accumulates over time. For those with farm ponds, you know what I am
speaking of, which is why without bottom aeration farms ponds eventually
need to be drained and cleaned out, usually by bulldozers.
3) Many streams, or other shallow bodies, where there is flowing water, will
have rocky bottoms, as the flow of water keeps the sediments from
depositing.
4) The reason many "ponders" can get away with a rocky bottom, without the
buildup of hydrogen sulfide, and other anaerobic decomposition products (ie
methane, etc), is the depth of the pond is so shallow, 2 feet or less, that
the action of their Aquascape/ related skimmer system gets enough water flow
going to help remove some of the smaller solids/DOC before they deposit on
the bottom and get trapped between the rocks. Obviously larger solids can
accumulate, which is why Aquascape, as part of their dealer seminars,
emphasizes surface nets during the autumn to keep out larger debris, as part
of their recommendations.
5) The nurseries are also instructed they can get an additional several
hundred $$ to "open the ponds" of their customers each spring, which
involves several hours of draining the pond, power washing the stony bottom
and sides of the water garden, then refilling with "fresh water". They then
sell the customer the (expensive in my opinion) bacteria necessary to
"start-up the filter", which of course was destroyed when they power washed
the stone, both on the bottom and lining the sides of the water garden.
My opinion.. customers are being taken financial advantage of by some of the
dealers in this fashion, etc by charging for services that the average
customer could do, if the system was set up to allow this..
I must add if people are happy with what they have, then that's fine.. they
are just paying more to have "professionals" take care of their water
gardens than the "do it yourselfers".
We all are different, which makes life so interesting, and exciting at
times. The best examples of this are seen during your local club's annual
water garden tours. You see some great ideas and initiatives!
IMHO, if you keep the depth 2 feet or less, you can get away without a
bottom drain, and can use rocks without any problems. Shallow gardens like
that are really Goldfish oriented, more than Koi.
Yes, (I will say this to avoid starting a flame war) people can keep Koi in
them, but Koi are better suited for ponds at least 3 feet in depth of more..
but that is another discussion.
In summary, pick what you want (rock vs. rock free), and enjoy your
garden/pond!
The more educated you are, the better you can make decisions that will meet
your individual needs, and the needs of your watery pets.
People it seems best learn from their experiences, both good and bad, but I
would hope each of you reads, reads and reads! In this way the experience of
others can help you benefit from their mistakes in advance.
There is no single right or wrong way to create your garden, but there are
ways that can help you avoid problems later on.
Good water quality is what you are shooting for. That really is what all the
arguments rollup into. That will determine the success or failure of your
water gardens/ponds.
Happy ponding,
Greg



Next post will follow..
Happy ponding,
Greg


"~ jan" wrote in message
s.com...
Yes, that's what I believe too. Though I believe his plan is to maintain

it
himself, he is a retired gent.... a healthy retired gent, but still, once
one gets in those upper years (you know, like above 40) one never knows
what will strike one down temporarily or slow one down permanently. This
gentleman is at least in his late 60s. ~ jan

On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 16:35:22 GMT, Theron wrote:


In the case of the Aquascape system, the nursery will make most of its
money from the sale of the weekly/monthly chemical additions and the
once a year cleaning of the rocks. A pond of this kind is a cash cow
for maintanance as long as the pond owner has it, and has the
installer maintain it.

Theron



See my ponds and filter design:
http://users.owt.com/jjspond/

~Keep 'em Wet!~
Tri-Cities WA Zone 7a
To e-mail see website