"Dave the exTrailer" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:44:49 -0000, "michael adams"
wrote:


"Dave the exTrailer" wrote in message
.. .

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:15:58 -0000, "michael adams"
wrote:


"The Invalid" wrote in message
.. .

You forgot to accuse me of rhubarb stalks, and of forcing rhubarb
to
apologise.
Do try harder, the standard of trolling on this newsgroup is just
not
what it used to be.

Janet

I think you need a humour transplant


While you clearly carry your Donor Card with you, wherever you go.

You don't dress up in funny clothes as well, by any chance do you ?

michael adams

My son thinks so


That's very interesting Dave, so you post under two different names then
do you ? Just so as to be able to mount two handed attacks on Janet ?

"Dave the exTrailer" and "The Invalid"

And just because Janet didn't laugh at one of your "jokes"

How very noble and sporting of you there, Dave.

Or did you simply make a mistake, and reply to the wrong post,
which I addressed to The Invalid ?

I was making a comment or am I not allowed to do that in this group?


If you weren't quite so stupid, you might even have pulled it off.

"Both of you" posting through Individual on exactly the same build
of Forte Agent, simply in order to launch the same sort of personal
attacks within an hour of one another.

Dave -


Wow thats spooky isnt it.
I wonder how many people are using the same version of agent and also
Individual net

....

So you're weren't posting under two different nyms?

So why did you answer a question in a post, which I'd clearly
addressed to somebody else ?

What made you think it had anything to do with you?

....


Have you checked under your ned lately for terrorists



....

No need.

It's much more fun outing humourless incompetents like you on
NewsGroups.

But only when as a result, they make themselves particularly
objectionable.

Otherwise, you of course have every right to be as humourless
and incompetent as you wish.

....


What's the matter Dave, too much of a coward to post under your
own name or something ?

Grow up you halfwit


....

That's rich, coming from someone already hiding his identity by posting
under one nym - as all mature adults posting on gardening NewsGroups will
want to do - quite naturally.

And then to cap it all, you decide to be clever by posting under
a sock*. Except you forgot yourself and replied to a question
directed to the sock, by mistake. You can't really get much
more stupid than that.

Truly priceless in fact.


michael adams

*sock puppet - when one poster is posting under more than one name
at the same time. The other names are his or her sock-puppets.


....