"0tterbot" wrote in message
...
"George.com" wrote in message
...

"Chookie" wrote in message
...
In article ,
gardenlen wrote:

i mean there are more huge gas guzzling 4X's in the 'burbs than we
ever saw in rural, and all just to deliver prodgoney to school.

There's a reason people call them Mosman/Toorak tractors!

called Remuera tractors over here. The little shits should try walking
or
cycling to school, there wouldn't be 1/2 the traffic on the roads in the
morning if some dumb mum/dad (insert whatever replacement words fits for
you) didn't take the single kid 1/2 way across town to school and 1/2
the
shits wouldn't be near as fat as they are.

is that a fact. don't you think it's the four-wheel-drivers who are the
"shits" in this issue? no kid i know gets to choose the family car, nor
gets
to choose until they're much older which method they get to school with,
either. the only "shits" in the equation as far as i can see are the shits
who clog up the roads because _they_ are too lazy or paranoid to walk,
making walking & cycling less safe for other people, which includes other
people's children (and their own) who DO walk or cycle to school.

i don't mind it if you call a shit a shit, but you've got completely the
wrong shit here.
kylie

a point of correction obviously needed here otterbot, I was meaning the
little shits. Its the little shits who get driven to school by, to adopt
your usage, the 'shits'.