"0tterbot" wrote in message
...
"George.com" wrote in message
...

"0tterbot" wrote in message
...
"George.com" wrote in message
...

"Chookie" wrote in message
...
In article ,
gardenlen wrote:

i mean there are more huge gas guzzling 4X's in the 'burbs than we
ever saw in rural, and all just to deliver prodgoney to school.

There's a reason people call them Mosman/Toorak tractors!

called Remuera tractors over here. The little shits should try
walking
or
cycling to school, there wouldn't be 1/2 the traffic on the roads in
the
morning if some dumb mum/dad (insert whatever replacement words fits
for
you) didn't take the single kid 1/2 way across town to school and 1/2
the
shits wouldn't be near as fat as they are.

is that a fact. don't you think it's the four-wheel-drivers who are the
"shits" in this issue? no kid i know gets to choose the family car, nor
gets
to choose until they're much older which method they get to school
with,
either. the only "shits" in the equation as far as i can see are the
shits
who clog up the roads because _they_ are too lazy or paranoid to walk,
making walking & cycling less safe for other people, which includes
other
people's children (and their own) who DO walk or cycle to school.

i don't mind it if you call a shit a shit, but you've got completely
the
wrong shit here.
kylie

a point of correction obviously needed here otterbot, I was meaning the
little shits. Its the little shits who get driven to school by, to adopt
your usage, the 'shits'.

ah, i see. thank you for the correction.

in that case, i still object to "little shits" based on no evidence being
presented, but that is evidently my problem g
kylie

evidence you say, my nieces and nephew as examples.

rob