View Single Post
  #45   Report Post  
Old 25-07-2006, 07:37 PM posted to uk.legal,uk.local.hampshire,uk.local.isle-of-wight,uk.local.southwest,uk.rec.gardening
[email protected][_1_] amimissingsomething@gmail.com[_1_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 12
Default Israel attacks/ international law?


Arthur wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:07:23 +0100,
wrote:

Haha!! The "I didn't know any better" Defense!!

Not quite. The "I'm doing the best I can with the tools at hand" defence.
Of course they would have liked to hit military tagets, but they have
basic, inaccurate weapons.


Now it's The Israeli's fault because they have better weapons and a
more efficient military!!

Exactly. They have precision tools and they have destroyed the targets
they chose.
When we saw the Red Cross trucks burning, it was because they were
precisely targeted.


Are you serious?? Any reason why Israel would purposely target Red
Cross trucks?

So under your assumption, with their expertise and firepower,
Hospitals, bomb shelters and virtually anywhere that innocent civilians
gather could easily be targetted right? It's a small wonder then that
"only" 300 have died isn't it? With that firepower, and those
intentions I reckon that I could easily have killed at least a Hundred
Thousand by now!!

Perhaps, just maybe, (and this is only a theory!) that they are
actually destroying known Hezbollah strongholds and The deaths are
either terrorists or civilians in the wrong place at the wrong time?