Thread
:
Apples
View Single Post
#
30
22-09-2006, 09:33 AM posted to uk.rec.gardening
Uncle Marvo
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 742
Apples
In reply to La Puce ) who wrote this in
, I, Marvo, say :
Jim Jackson wrote:
cliff_the_gardener wrote:
Most true cookers cook to a puree or froth. As for a cooking apple
that cooks sweet and holds it shape on cooking. Would probalbly go
for something like Charles Ross. A desert that cooks orange and
holds shape - when young! You could always go American and use a
ripe Golden Delicious as a cooker. (Waiting for uproar)
No - why? The french just cook with eating apples. They don't
differentiate.
I think the poor Golden Delicious has been classed as a really rubbish
apple - that and the fact that prior to being in supermarkets it has
been stored for months in carbon dioxide ... There's a fashion about
apples atm. If it's not red or shiny, it must be 'a connoisseur's
variety'. I certainly had fallen for it when bying my apple tree years
ago... Where were you Cliff when I needed you, huh?!
I still like the GD, although you're right, it has become "unfashionable". I
don't understand why, I think a crisp, sharp apple is nicer, although the
sweeter "English" reds seem to be more popular, especially with my
littl'uns.
Reply With Quote
Uncle Marvo
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Uncle Marvo