"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)" contains these words:



I will go with cordyline as well but if it's a cordyline then I don't
think
it is australis because the leaves look a tad too broad. It certainly
seems
to have a very thick trunk for an australis at this stage of growth and I
would have thought that the lower leaves would have died by now.
Cordyline
indivisa perhaps.

I have what the nursery grower claimed was a seedling cordyline
indivisa, (have to say, his labelling is not great). It has much broader
leaves than the OP's pic, the underneaths are a powdery blue . But it's
a slow thing and certainly hasn't make the rapid growth of the OP's, (
still barely 2 ft tall with no trunk, after 2 years)

snip
Janet.

I think on this occasion his labelling is correct. It sounds exactly like a
pukka indivisa unlike the one I bought last week from Homebase labelled as
such. Nice wide leaves but missing the obligatory blue - a bargain which is
to be planted in wet shade as an experiment:-)