In message et, Sally
Thompson writes
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:15:43 +0100, June Hughes wrote
(in article ):

In message .com, La
Puce writes

June Hughes wrote:
If this is untrue, I shall
be pleased to hear from Helene to the contrary.

June, can we take this via email please?! I haven't sent any emails.
Ask her to send them to you as a proof.
Snip

I am rather embarrassed to say, I can't find Judith's email address in
my address book, which I can't understand. I notice from another thread
that she appears to have left urg, so hope that some kind soul will
forward this to her.


I have Judith's email address (and I'm sure so have others), but I really
don't want to upset her any further than she has already been upset by
repeating the posting you are referring to. Is your email valid? If you
like, I can email Judith and ask her to contact you direct.


Yes, of course my email address is valid. Judith already has it. I am
given to understand that a series of emails have been circulated stating
that I am 'in cahoots' (to use one person's phrase) with Puce. I have
not had the advantage of seeing any of them. I am unsure as to the ins
and outs of the laws of libel regarding email but am very unhappy about
what appear to be several people - mainly ladies - with too much time on
their hands writing derogatory things about me behind my back. That is
not what urg is about. If I find out the contents of these emails I
shall vigorously pursue whatever legal course of action is available to
me if they are in any way libellous, which if the person advising me of
them is correct, I think they may be.
--
June Hughes