GardenBanter.co.uk - View Single Post

Sacha[_1_] · 19-10-2006, 01:53 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening

On 19/10/06 13:20, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Sacha
writes
On 19/10/06 11:16, in article , "June
Hughes" wrote:

In message , Stan The Man
writes
Thank-you. As I only have copies of two emails from Judith to Sacha at
present, I really don't think that is enough. I am heartily sick of all
this squabbling between these people and have been marking several
threads here as read without opening them until yesterday evening when I
returned home from work to find an email from Sacha enclosing a copy of
the first email from Judith to her.

Which Judith asked me to send you, telling you she would take no emails from
you, as you have been working against her 'and others' behind her their
backs and with Puke.

They are the only two I have seen.

Do you think twisting the truth is going to get you out of this? I
forwarded to you every email Judith asked me to send. But you know and I
know that I have received god alone knows how many from you, clearly
panicking and twisting in the wind and hoping to use me as a conduit to
Judith. This morning your tone changed 100% from regret and a hope to make
things better to your usual belligerence when you can't get your own way and
are shown up as you are. IOW, your computer and Puke's must have been white
hot last night and early this morning, while you were instructed on what to
say and how to wiggle out of your part in the vicious behaviour meted out to
me, Judith and Janet. You're in this up to your neck and you know it.

As for your other ridiculous thread
posting headers, what exactly are you intending to prove? This must be
taking an awful lot of your time. Do you actually do any work at all,
or are you a kept woman?

Nobody keeps me, June. Let's just say there's no need for that.
But how seriously common of you - a qualified accountant, I believe - to
query how other people fund their lives. Unethical too, I shouldn't wonder,
especially on a public newsgroup. I wonder what your professional body
would think of such things - breaches of confidence aren't smiled upon in
your job, are they?

BTW the people who said here that you would be back were right. Exactly
what you said about Puce.

Amazing. No wonder you told me in email that you wouldn't repudiate what
Puke has said on here - you can't. She really has got you over a barrel.

Puke came back to lie and swear to at and about someone I respect and like
very much. So I'm here only to make sure you don't get away with your lie
that you are the victim of an email conspiracy and that Judith is turned, by
you, into a villain. There is no such conspiracy because to be honest,
you're just not that important.
It's amazing how you always have to portray yourself that way and take the
starring role - unsuccessfully. Your reputation for starting email
correspondences with people, working your way from conciliatory to
belligerent and thus to "don't speak to me again" is absolutely legendary -
and here we are, you're doing it again. Perhaps you've been instructed to
draw the flak away from Puke.......
Don't worry, I'll leave the giving of gardening advice to you and Puke.
Should be worth a ringside seat.

--
Sacha
www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/