On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:59:38 +0100, "Jim Webster"
wrote:


"Geoff" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:24:51 +0100, "Jim Webster"
wrote:


"Geoff" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:35:32 +0100, "Jim Webster"
wrote:


"Geoff" wrote in message
om...
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:28:08 +0100, Old Codger
wrote:

Sla#s wrote:
Geoff wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:49:40 +0100, "Pat Gardiner"
wrote:
SNIP

What does an innocent man have to hide from ID cards?



"People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security
deserve
neither and will lose both."

B Franklin

And

Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,
habe ich geschwiegen;
ich war ja kein Kommunist....

Indeed and, given that folk can now have their liberty restricted for
long periods 'on suspicion' with no trial, it has already started.


Good.

yes, they seem to be hitting the animal rights people pretty hard


Not from where I'm standing

corpse diggers doing time, a good start
they'll be working their way down the list
and just think, with the new laws on the statute they can pull anyone in
on
suspicion of terrorism and keep them inside for quite a while

As they already have done to pro hunt nuts.

just watch for the knock on the door

Anytime. How long you nuts been saying that?

pete

There is no pete. Fool. I suppose you could be clinging to that fake
to avoid confronting your demons? Anytime you or your dumb buddies
fancy their chances........

wonder if anyone has talked. or perhaps someone has just forwarded them some
of your posts

Why not you? Ask yourself what you could do to save face!